
Pick up our current issue at 500 locations throughout Virginia’s River Country
|
Nature
|
|
|
Written by Lara Lutz
|
Brook trout named an indicator for restoration of Mid-Atlantic streams
It is difficult to find a healthy population of native brook trout in the Mid-Atlantic. But the little fish were recently extended a big helping hand in a report designed to restore a water body in which they will never swim – the Chesapeake Bay. Brook trout are the region’s only native trout, and according to a recent study they have vanished from nearly half of the Mid-Atlantic watersheds that once supported them. Now, a strategy to restore the Chesapeake calls for upgrading brook trout habitat in 58 local watersheds from “reduced” to “healthy.” The deadline for this goal is 2025. Brook trout advocates hope that momentum and funds will follow. “If brook trout had a vote, they would be excited about the Chesapeake Bay executive order (they order that prompted the restoration strategy),” said Mark Hudy, aquatic ecologist with the USDA Forest Service. Efforts to restore the bay have long included goals for restoring crabs, oysters, and migratory fish that move between freshwater rivers and the saltier Chesapeake Bay. The new brook trout goals are the first to address an upland fish species that will never swim in the waters of the Bay. Leopold Miranda-Castro, supervisor of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Chesapeake Bay Field Office, said “Brook trout have been kind of forgotten in the last two decades.” The new goal makes the trout an official measure of the progress of restoring the headwater streams that feed the region’s big rivers that in turn flow to the bay.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
Written by Dan Gill
|
|
Photo courtesy of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Photo by Barron Crawford.
When Europeans first came to this country, there was a healthy balance between predator and prey populations. Other than man, the native wolf was the alpha predator at the top of the food chain. There were no natural enemies of the wolf prior to settlement by Europeans; populations were kept in check by the abundance and condition of prey populations, such as deer, rabbits and rodents. Predators kept prey populations healthy and in check by removing the slow, weak and infirm; in turn, the health and abundance of prey regulated predator populations. Native Americans respected the wolf: They had a semi-tame relationship with some and used them on hunts for wild turkey and small game.
Settlers soon changed the natural balance as they introduced better prey: they brought in hogs and cattle and turned them loose to forage on the abundant mast of the forest: acorns, chestnuts and wild plants. They tried sheep, which are even better prey. The result was wild population swings. First, the hogs greatly increased in numbers followed by a dramatic increase in wolf numbers in response to the increased availability of food (see the classic writings of Malthus: a population will increase exponentially within the limits of its food supply). It was reported that they (wolves) became so numerous that they were “. . .constantly heard at night in the vicinity of Jamestown as they hunted like packs of yelping beagles in the neighboring woods; and it was difficult for the planter, overtaken in the forest by darkness, and compelled to go into camp until morning, to save his frightened horse from their devouring jaws.”
|
|
Read more...
|
|
Written by Scott Duprey
|
|
I get a kick out of people who say they wouldn't live in the country because there's nothing to do. Holy mackerel! All you gotta do around here is just go out the back door, and you'll end up somewhere—in a pasture of cattle, a fallow field, the woods, a swamp (good for taking the pigs for a walk and to catch turtles and snakes), a small town (better in the morning for a hot cup of coffee and fresh pastry), a vineyard (best on wine-tasting days), an old barn, parks, the beach—you name it.
Unlike city dwellers, country folk live their lives by the seasons, remaining in step with nature's cyclical pageant. In the fall, we're sweeping the chimney, putting away for the winter, taking stock of the vegetables and fruits we've canned, digging sweet potatoes, freezing greens, winterizing the house and boat, cutting and stacking wood, collecting walnuts to crack around the Christmas tree, and picking the last of late crabs for eating crabcakes on a snowy winter's day.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
Written by Ruby Lee Norris
|
|
The following article appeared in the March April 1993 edition. Ruby Lee Norris, still an ongoing contributor to PL, is available to answer your gardening questions at
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
A Perennial Garden of Flowers, Vegetables, and Herbs:
A Practiced Gardener Tells How Hers Grew and How to Make Yours Thrive
By Ruby Lee Norris
Roses, asparagus, strawberries, peonies, day lilies, iris, chrysanthemums—all growing together in a perennial garden. This is our garden. Like Topsy, it and our knowledge of gardening “just grew.” Beginning as a usual vegetable garden, it eventually evolved into a perennial garden. We have no training in gardening except having grown up on a farm. As if by osmosis, we have always known certain things about planting, hoeing, weeding and feeding. Not until we were grandparents did we decide to plant some vegetables. We wanted our city-bred grandsons to plant some potato “eyes” and have the thrill of digging the matured new potatoes, to watch while cucumbers swelled overnight into green oblongs and to wait for days to see tomatoes ripen from green to red.
We were amazed to find that during the years between childhood and grandparenthood our “mental computer” had safely stored much of what we absorbed as youngsters. As we planned our garden, we welcomed suggestions from the local Southern States store personnel, from gardening columns, leaflets and neighbors. Let us suggest that the best of all these sources is a neighbor.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 Next > End >> |
|
Page 1 of 3 |
|
|